<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

We're blowing the whistle on Legacy PAM 🏀 Join us for an Access Madness Webinar on March 28

Search
Close icon
Search bar icon

CyberArk vs. Delinea (Thycotic & Centrify): Which Is Better?

Summary: In this article, we’ll compare two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions: CyberArk vs. Delinea (Thycotic Centrify), with a closer look at what they are, how they work, and which will best fit your organization. We’ll explore product summaries, use cases, pros and cons, PAM features, and pricing to that by the end of this article, you’ll have a clearer understanding of how these PAM tools work and be able to choose the one that’s right for you.

With the growing rate of cybercrime, keeping your business and its valuable information safe is now more critical than ever. An effective Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution can help protect your organization from cyberattacks such as brute force, SQL injection, mishandling of sensitive information, and compliance risks.

Organizations need a reliable way to monitor and manage access to resources without disrupting productivity. So, CyberArk vs. Thycotic—which PAM solution is better? Let’s find out.

What is CyberArk?

CyberArk is an identity access management solution that enables organizations to protect, control, and manage privileged accounts and credentials in a cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid environment. With CyberArk Privileged Access Management, you can manage information and assign security credentials for your applications and sensitive programs.

CyberArk Product Summary

CyberArk PAM provides database and server access to privileged users on engineering or IT teams. It contains features like a password vault and privileged access manager that allow companies to focus on protecting privileged accounts.

CyberArk Use Cases

CyberArk helps organizations:

  • Secure privileged credentials in a vault
  • Manage encryption keys
  • Rotate credentials based on policies
  • Monitor and record privileged sessions
  • Control access to SSL/SSH certificates
  • Manage third-party/remote access

CyberArk Pros & Cons

CyberArk may be a reliable choice for large enterprises, as it offers:

  • Extensive product capabilities
  • On-premises and cloud data deployment
  • User analytics and reporting
  • Threat detection

However, the tool can be difficult to implement. Challenges include:

  • Complex installation requiring expert product knowledge
  • Old-school graphical user interface (GUI) design that is hard to navigate
  • Complex pricing model
  • Limited support for modern databases
  • Lack of support for Kubernetes and other containerized solutions

Learn more about CyberArk's competitors and alternatives.

⚠️ Traditional PAM deployments have gaps. Learn how to protect your databases, the cloud, Kubernetes, and more with our legacy PAM augmentation guide.

What is Delinea (Thycotic)?

Delinea (formerly known as ThycoticCentrify) helps companies prevent ransomware and security threats by managing administrative rights and enforcing least privilege access to privileged accounts.

Delinea Product Summary

Thycotic manages privileged user access to applications, servers, database management systems, and other resources through a centralized authentication process. This PAM tool provides password rotation and an encrypted secret vault to store keys and credentials.

Delinea Use Cases

Thycotic PAM helps organizations:

  • Store secrets and credentials such as passwords and usernames
  • Monitor server sessions
  • Rotate passwords
  • Log user activity
  • Manage privileged access to networks, servers, applications, and databases

Delinea Pros & Cons

Delinea PAM is robust and flexible, providing efficient privileged access security through comprehensive audits and behavior analytics. Its benefits include:

  • Straightforward secrets management
  • Effective session management features
  • Clear documentation
  • User-friendly interface

However, Delinea falls short in modern computing environments. This PAM solution:

  • Offers poor support for modern databases
  • Requires installation on your server
  • Does not support Kubernetes deployments
  • Includes only limited third-party integrations

Learn more about Delinea's competitors and alternatives.

StrongDM: A Better Alternative to CyberArk and Delinea (Thycotic)

Traditional PAM solutions fall short when it comes to onboarding and offboarding, compliance, credential sharing, and tool integration. These tools have too narrow a scope, and their implementation, troubleshooting, and upgrading can be complex, requiring extensive product-specific training.

Furthermore, PAM tools can be difficult to implement without hindering productivity. Our recent Access-Productivity Report found that infrastructure access affects the productivity of 64% of companies. This means that unnecessary delay or access to the required resources wastes time and money.

StrongDM offers secure access that puts your people first. It moves beyond PAM to provide technical staff with role-based, attributed-based, and just-in-time access to the critical infrastructure they need to do their jobs.

StrongDM simplifies workflows and improves productivity while maintaining organizational security. It manages and audits access to resources using a zero-trust model, helping prevent the cyberattacks associated with unlimited and un-revoked privileges.

With straightforward pricing, custom tool integrations, and excellent customer support, StrongDM is an excellent choice for businesses of all sizes.

So, Which One Should You Choose?

Here’s a quick review of the key features to help you decide.

  CyberArk Delinea StrongDM
Best for Enterprises Small to medium-sized businesses Enterprises and start-ups looking to scale
Setup Complex, requires product-specific expertise Simple implementation Simple, fast implementation
Navigation Outdated GUI is difficult to navigate Simple, user-friendly interface Intuitive, user-friendly design
Modern database support Limited Limited Broad support for legacy, modern, and cloud-based data sources
Kubernetes support No No Yes
Installation Requires product expertise. Must be installed on your server Must be installed on your server No installation required on your server
Documentation Documentation is technical and overly complex Good documentation Excellent documentation
Customer support Offers only limited support Offers year-round support on premium packages only Offers 24/7/365 support to all users
Pricing CyberArk offers a 30-day free trial.

The pricing model is complex, requiring a custom plan from the sales team.
Thycotic offers a 30-day free trial.

Requires a custom pricing plan from the sales team.
StrongDM gives a 14-day free trial.

It has a single, straightforward pricing plan — $70 per user per month.

Are you looking for a People-First way to manage privileged access? Book your demo of StrongDM today.

About the Author

, Customer Engineering Expert, has worked in the information security industry for 20 years on tasks ranging from firewall administration to network security monitoring. His obsession with getting people access to answers led him to publish Practical Vulnerability Management with No Starch Press in 2020. He holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Clark University, an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Connecticut, and an M.S. in Information Management from the University of Washington. To contact Andy, visit him on LinkedIn.

StrongDM logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and CyberArk are privileged access management solutions to provide secure access to backend infrastructure. While there are many similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Which One Is Better
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and Teleport are access control solutions designed to provide secure access to databases, servers, clusters, and web apps. While there are some similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
AWS Secrets Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to AWS Secrets Manager
AWS Secrets Manager is a popular and highly intuitive secrets management tool that lets organizations automate secrets rotation processes and securely store, manage, and audit IT credentials. However, certain AWS Secrets Manager alternatives are available if you are looking to avoid getting tied down exclusively to AWS products or prioritize efficient user onboarding. In this product comparison guide, we evaluate AWS Secrets Manager competitors that can fill in some of its product gaps.
Azure Key Vault Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Azure Key Vault
Microsoft Azure Key Vault is a cryptographic and secrets management solution for storing encryption keys, certificates, and passwords. While known for its interface simplicity and robust security, users should look to Azure Key Vault alternatives if they prioritize employee onboarding automation or need quick and easy implementation. This article evaluates Azure Key Vault competitors regarding security features, pricing, and usability to identify the best alternative options.
Google Cloud Secret Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Google Cloud Secret Manager
Google Cloud Secret Manager is an intuitive platform for managing API keys, user passwords, digital certificates, and other sensitive data and administering access control policies for business resources. While cost-friendly and reliable for securing Google Cloud applications, you should look to other Google Cloud Secret Manager competitors if you manage complex infrastructure and need multiple integrations.