<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

Curious about how StrongDM works? 🤔 Learn more here!

Search
Close icon
Search bar icon

Alternatives to HashiCorp Vault

HashiCorp Vault Competitors
StrongDM manages and audits access to infrastructure.
  • Role-based, attribute-based, & just-in-time access to infrastructure
  • Connect any person or service to any infrastructure, anywhere
  • Logging like you've never seen

HashiCorp Vault is a powerful secrets management tool that is well suited to automating the creation, distribution, and destruction of secrets. However, if your goal is to secure access to sensitive systems, a secrets store is not the only approach. In this blog post, we’ll look at a few HashiCorp Vault alternatives, with my take on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. 

HashiCorp Vault Overview

Brief product summary

Vault is a complete secrets management product, allowing end users to interact with a secure vault (server) to store, retrieve, and generate credentials for a wide variety of systems, including databases, various cloud providers, and SSH. It is built on a client-server model and is accessible via a command-line tool, a REST API, and a web interface. Its capability of creating and deleting ephemeral credentials allows users to build secure automation functionality with minimal risk of leaking credentials.

Use Cases

  • Storing sensitive credentials that can be accessed manually, via a CLI, or an API.
  • Generating ephemeral credentials for one-time access to databases, cloud environments, and a variety of other secure environments.
  • Securing automated processes that require secrets to connect to secure environments.

Pluses

  • Because it has a fully functional API, it is well-suited for integrating with automated tools and processes.
  • Ephemeral credentials increase security by existing only long enough to be used and then discarded.
  • Any form of data can be stored via the API, CLI, or web UI, making it a very flexible method of protecting a wide variety of secrets: credentials, API keys, tokens, and even binary data via Base64 encoding.

Minuses

  • API and command-line utility, not user-transparent.
  • Not suitable for end-user credential management.
  • Requires custom integration work to fit into existing workflows.
  • Complex pricing model.

Former HashiCorp Vault customer quote "Updating HashiCorp Vault was this giant project, where the entire team would have to get in a room just to manage Vault and exchange keys. And then when another update happened, no one could remember how we did it previously. Things were constantly breaking." — Drew Blas, Director of Internal Engineering at Betterment

1. StrongDM

strongdm-new-homepage-screenshot

Brief product summary

StrongDM is a control plane that makes it easier for organizations to secure access to databases, servers, and Kubernetes. Instead of distributing access across a combination of VPN, individual database credentials, & SSH keys, StrongDM unifies management in your existing SSO and keeps credentials hidden. Neither credentials nor keys are accessible by end users. Because StrongDM deconstructs every protocol, it also logs all database queries, complete SSH and RDP sessions, and kubectl activity.

Use Cases

  • Faster onboarding - no need to provision database credentials, ssh keys, VPN passwords for each new hire.
  • Secure offboarding - suspend SSO access once to revoke all database, and server access.
  • Automatically adopt security best practices - least privilege, just-in-time access, ephemeral permissions, audit trail.
  • Comprehensive logging and reporting- log every permission change, database query, ssh & kubectl command.
  • Vendor privileged access management-connect third-party vendors to resources with project-based access that automatically expires.
  • Security and compliance teams-simplify HIPAA, SOC 2, SOX, ISO 27001 compliance certification.
  • Modern Cloud PAM solution-built to support a variety of cloud networks, including public, private, multi-cloud, and hybrid.

Pluses

  • Easy deployment - self-healing mesh network of proxies.
  • No change to workflow- use any SQL client, CLI, or desktop BI tool.
  • Standardize logs across any database type, Linux or Windows server.
  • Secret store support - fills in the gaps and offers the benefits of Vault alongside the benefits of StrongDM.
  • Simple, straightforward pricing.

Minuses

  • Requires continual access to StrongDM API for access to managed resources.

StrongDM’s G2 Reviews

  • 51 reviews (at the time of writing)
  • 4.8 / 5 stars

Read all of StrongDM’s G2 reviews here.

g2-review-screenshot

Pricing Information

StrongDM offers simple per-user pricing, starting at $70/license, including support for all resource types.

Users have the option to sign up for a free 14-day trial.

strongdm-new-pricing

2. HashiCorp Vault Open-Source

Brief product summary

The open-source version of HashiCorp Vault is the same as the enterprise version, though it is missing several enterprise features, including:

  • MFA integration for client authentication.
  • Vault replication and disaster recovery workflows.
  • Namespaces for multi-tenancy.
  • Support for hardware security modules.

Use Cases

Because this is a version of the enterprise Vault product, much the same use cases apply here. However, because it does not have numerous enterprise-level features, this product will require additional local modification to be suitable for enterprise deployment.

Pluses

  • It’s free!
  • Community resources available for configuration and troubleshooting.

Minuses

  • Lacks enterprise-friendly features such as replication and disaster recovery capability.
  • No formal support or SLA.

3. Homebrew (In-house)

Brief product summary

If you lack the budget for a commercial product, or if your use case does not fit neatly within the feature sets offered by commercial products, you always have the option of building a homebrew solution using in-house resources. Typically this will involve a significant engineering effort, both to scope and build the solution and to maintain it going forward. Not only that, but auditors may look askance at your homebrew solution unless it has been tested and validated by an outside authority such as a penetration test or white-box code analysis. The benefit, of course, is that you will be able to produce a tool that matches your specific needs.

Use Cases

Because a homebrew secrets management system is entirely developed in-house, it can be designed and built to accommodate any specific required use cases for the organization. In order to build a functional and secure homebrew secrets management tool, you will need to have significant in-house security engineering expertise.

Pluses

  • It’s free (at least, in dollars).
  • Fully customized to required use cases.

Minuses

  • Extensive time investment for development and maintenance.
  • In-house security engineering expertise required.
  • No external support available.
  • Extensive testing, including external testing, will be needed to verify solution from an auditing perspective.

About the Author

, Customer Engineering Expert, has worked in the information security industry for 20 years on tasks ranging from firewall administration to network security monitoring. His obsession with getting people access to answers led him to publish Practical Vulnerability Management with No Starch Press in 2020. He holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Clark University, an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Connecticut, and an M.S. in Information Management from the University of Washington. To contact Andy, visit him on LinkedIn.

StrongDM logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

StrongDM vs. AWS SSM Session Manager: Side-by-Side Comparison
StrongDM vs. AWS SSM Session Manager: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both AWS Systems Manager (SSM) Session Manager and StrongDM are solutions for gaining remote access to critical infrastructure. Yet, while they share some of the same capabilities required of an enterprise access management platform, the execution and the ultimate goals they accomplish for security and compliance teams are very different.
StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and CyberArk are privileged access management solutions to provide secure access to backend infrastructure. While there are many similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Which One Is Better
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and Teleport are access control solutions designed to provide secure access to databases, servers, clusters, and web apps. While there are some similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
AWS Secrets Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to AWS Secrets Manager
AWS Secrets Manager is a popular and highly intuitive secrets management tool that lets organizations automate secrets rotation processes and securely store, manage, and audit IT credentials. However, certain AWS Secrets Manager alternatives are available if you are looking to avoid getting tied down exclusively to AWS products or prioritize efficient user onboarding. In this product comparison guide, we evaluate AWS Secrets Manager competitors that can fill in some of its product gaps.
Azure Key Vault Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Azure Key Vault
Microsoft Azure Key Vault is a cryptographic and secrets management solution for storing encryption keys, certificates, and passwords. While known for its interface simplicity and robust security, users should look to Azure Key Vault alternatives if they prioritize employee onboarding automation or need quick and easy implementation. This article evaluates Azure Key Vault competitors regarding security features, pricing, and usability to identify the best alternative options.