<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">
Search
Close icon
Search bar icon

StrongDM: Breaking Glass Scenarios

See StrongDM in action →
Breaking Glass Scenarios

Contents

Secure Access Made Simple

Built for Security. Loved by Devs.

  • Free Trial — No Credit Card Needed
  • Full Access to All Features
  • Trusted by the Fortune 100, early startups, and everyone in between

Let’s face it. If you work with any type of technology, you know that all software, hardware, and networking gear can fail in weird and unexpected ways. That’s why it’s critical that your technology stack has no single point of failure in your environment.

At StrongDM, that means having options in a break glass” scenario. We firmly believe that this is a requirement for the responsible operation of modern technology. So here’s how we tackle it.

StrongDM is a proxy that combines authentication, authorization, networking, and observability into a single product. As such, StrongDM makes it easy to maintain secure access and auditing for your workflows with fail-closed if we can’t authenticate you with our control plane (which you want for security reasons).

In the case that this happens, whether due to a misconfiguration or other issue, you would still need some level of access to your key infrastructure. That’s why StrongDM doesn’t lock you out of creating “break glass” emergency access.

How to Break Glass with StrongDM

Understanding how to break glass when using StrongDM requires a few very simple steps. The process is focused on creating accounts specifically for a break-glass scenario, protecting those accounts, and ensuring that access to those accounts is closely monitored. Here’s how:

  1. Implement a Break-Glass Account: Create a limited-access "break-glass" account with highly restricted privileges that can be used only during emergencies. This account should have a complex, unique password and be stored securely offline, accessible only to authorized personnel, such as the IT security team or senior management.
  2. Define Clear Access Policies: Develop a comprehensive set of policies and procedures for emergency access. Specify the circumstances under which the break-glass account can be used, the process for requesting access, and the necessary approvals.
  3. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enforce multi-factor authentication for the break-glass account to add an extra layer of security. This can include something the user knows (password), something the user has (smartphone or token), and/or something the user is (biometric data).
  4. Limited Time Window: Restrict the usage time window for the break-glass account. Once the emergency is resolved, disable the account immediately.
  5. Audit and Monitoring: Implement robust logging and monitoring to track all activities performed using the break-glass account. This helps in post-incident analysis and ensures accountability.
  6. Regular Testing: Conduct periodic testing and drills of the emergency access procedure to ensure that all involved parties understand their roles and responsibilities. This helps identify and address any potential issues before an actual outage occurs.
  7. Secure Offsite Backup: Maintain a secure offsite backup of essential PAM-related data, configurations, and credentials. This will allow a faster recovery in the event of a PAM system failure.
  8. Communication Plan: Develop a clear communication plan to inform stakeholders and authorized personnel about the PAM outage, the emergency access procedure, and any other relevant details.
  9. Continuous Improvement: Regularly review and update the emergency access procedure based on lessons learned from previous drills or incidents. Continuous improvement is vital for maintaining a robust and resilient security posture.

Additional Considerations

Depending on your environment, there are additional actions you can take to ensure you’re prepared for the worst and to increase the security of your break-glass credentials.

On-premises environments: If the majority of your infrastructure is hosted on-premises, you do  have the option to store credentials on a hardware key, such as a Yubikey. You can also store the physical key in a physical vault, providing an additional layer of security.

Cloud environments: In the case that your environment is primarily based in the cloud, there are additional considerations you may want to take. For example, you could:

  • Prevent the use of cloud consoles through organization-wide Service Control Policies (SCPs) for each cloud provider
  • Alert on attempts to use cloud consoles outside of emergency situations
  • In an emergency situation, temporarily remove those SCPs, and use the cloud provider’s console to access the machine 

Conclusion

Regardless of your environment, having and testing a break glass scenario and technology provides options in the case of an emergency should be a core requirement in your IAM and PAM deployments. StrongDM takes these situations seriously and we’re committed to your success even when the worst happens.

See StrongDM in action, book a demo.

Dominic Garcia

About the Author

, Technical Marketing Expert, has held marketing leadership roles for Silicon Valley technology companies specializing in database, data management, and data analytics solutions. As head of content marketing at Splunk, Dominic contributed to boosting the company’s market visibility and its growth from a $100M to a $1.3B company. He brings relentless creativity to the task of connecting people with technical products to improve their lives. Dominic holds a B.S. degree in Public Relations from the University of Texas at Austin. To contact Dominic, visit him on LinkedIn.

💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

StrongDM Debuts in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management
StrongDM Debuts in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management
StrongDM debuts in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for PAM, redefining privileged access with real-time, policy-based authorization for modern cloud environments.
AI Agents Are Actors, Not Tools: Why Enterprises Need a New Layer of Runtime Governance
AI Agents Are Actors, Not Tools: Why Enterprises Need a New Layer of Runtime Governance
AI agents act autonomously, not just as tools. Learn why enterprises need runtime governance to secure, observe, and control AI behavior in real time.
Managing Access Drift: Introducing Entitlement Visibility, Resource Discovery, and JIT for Microsoft Cloud
Managing Access Drift: Introducing Entitlement Visibility, Resource Discovery, and JIT for Microsoft Cloud
The modern cloud is fast, dynamic, and complex. But legacy security tools can’t keep up. As containers and ephemeral resources constantly change, and access requests surge, security teams are left scrambling. Entitlements pile up, visibility fades, and audits become a nightmare.
Multi-Cloud vs Hybrid Cloud: Key Differences Explained
Multi-Cloud vs Hybrid Cloud: Key Differences Explained
The terms “multi-cloud” and “hybrid cloud” are often used interchangeably, but they solve very different problems. Multi-cloud uses multiple public cloud providers. A hybrid cloud blends public cloud with private or on-prem infrastructure. Your goals, compliance needs, and existing architecture determine which is right for you.
Why Legacy PAM Fails in the Cloud (And the Cloud-Native Fix)
Why Legacy PAM Fails in the Cloud (And the Cloud-Native Fix)
Legacy PAM stalls cloud adoption with cost, complexity, and risk. Discover the cloud-native fix: just-in-time access with StrongDM.