<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">

Alternatives to Hashicorp Vault

StrongDM manages and audits access to infrastructure.
  • Role-based, attribute-based, & just-in-time access to infrastructure
  • Connect any person or service to any infrastructure, anywhere
  • Logging like you've never seen

HashiCorp Vault is a powerful secrets management tool that is well suited to automating the creation, distribution, and destruction of secrets. However, if your goal is to secure access to sensitive systems, a secrets store is not the only approach. In this blog post we’ll look at a few alternatives, with my take on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. 

HashiCorp Vault

Brief product summary

Vault is a complete secrets management product, allowing end users to interact with a secure vault (server) to store, retrieve, and generate credentials for a wide variety of systems, including databases, various cloud providers, and SSH. It is built on a client-server model and is accessible via a command-line tool, a REST API, and a web interface. Its capability of creating and deleting ephemeral credentials allows users to build secure automation functionality with minimal risk of leaking credentials.

Use Cases

  • Storing sensitive credentials that can be accessed manually, via a CLI, or an API.
  • Generating ephemeral credentials for one-time access to databases, cloud environments, and a variety of other secure environments.
  • Securing automated processes that require secrets to connect to secure environments.

Pluses

  • Because it has a fully functional API, it is well suited for integrating with automated tools and processes.
  • Ephemeral credentials increase security by existing only long enough to be used then discarded.
  • Any form of data can be stored via the API, CLI, or web UI, making it a very flexible method of protecting a wide variety of secrets: credentials, API keys, tokens, and even binary data via Base64 encoding.

Minuses

  • API and command-line utility, not user-transparent.
  • Not suitable for end-user credential management.
  • Requires custom integration work to fit into existing workflows.
  • Complex pricing model.

Former HashiCorp Vault customer quote "Updating HashiCorp Vault was this giant project, where the entire team would have to get in a room just to manage Vault and exchange keys. And then when another update happened, no one could remember how we did it previously. Things were constantly breaking." — Drew Blas, Director of Internal Engineering at Betterment

StrongDM

Brief product summary

StrongDM is a control plane that makes it easier for organizations to secure access to databases, servers, and Kubernetes. Instead of distributing access across a combination of VPN, individual database credentials, & ssh keys, StrongDM unifies management in your existing SSO and keeps credentials hidden. Neither credentials nor keys are accessible by end users. Because StrongDM deconstructs every protocol, it also logs all database queries, complete SSH and RDP sessions, and kubectl activity.

Use Cases

  • Faster onboarding- no need to provision database credentials, ssh keys, VPN passwords for each new hire.
  • Secure offboarding- suspend SSO access once to revoke all database, server access.
  • Automatically adopt security best practices- least privilege, ephemeral permissions, audit trail.
  • Comprehensive logs- log every permission change, database query, ssh & kubectl command.

Pluses

  • Easy deployment - self healing mesh network of proxies.
  • No change to workflow- use any SQL client, CLI, or desktop BI tool.
  • Standardize logs across any database type, Linux or Windows server.
  • Secret store support - fills in the gaps and offers the benefits of Vault alongside the benefits of StrongDM.
  • Simple, straightforward pricing.

Minuses

  • Requires continual access to StrongDM API for access to managed resources.

HashiCorp Vault Open-Source

Brief product summary

The open-source version of HashiCorp Vault is the same as the enterprise version, though it is missing several enterprise features, including:

  • MFA integration for client authentication.
  • Vault replication and disaster recovery workflows.
  • Namespaces for multi-tenancy.
  • Support for hardware security modules.

Use Cases

Because this is a version of the enterprise Vault product, much the same use cases apply here. However, because it does not have numerous enterprise-level features, this product will require additional local modification to be suitable for enterprise deployment.

Pluses

  • It’s free!
  • Community resources available for configuration and troubleshooting.

Minuses

  • Lacks enterprise-friendly features such as replication and disaster recovery capability.
  • No formal support or SLA.

Homebrew (In-house)

Brief product summary

If you lack the budget for a commercial product, or if your use case does not fit neatly within the feature sets offered by commercial products, you always have the option of building a homebrew solution using in-house resources. Typically this will involve a significant engineering effort, both to scope and build the solution and to maintain it going forward. Not only that, but auditors may look askance at your homebrew solution unless it has been tested and validated by an outside authority such as a penetration test or white-box code analysis. The benefit, of course, is that you will be able to produce a tool that matches your specific needs.

Use Cases

Because a homebrew secrets management system is entirely developed in-house, it can be designed and built to accommodate any specific required use cases for the organization. In order to build a functional and secure homebrew secrets management tool, you will need to have significant in-house security engineering expertise.

Pluses

  • It’s free (at least, in dollars).
  • Fully customized to required use cases.

Minuses

  • Extensive time investment for development and maintenance.
  • In-house security engineering expertise required.
  • No external support available.
  • Extensive testing, including external testing, will be needed to verify solution from an auditing perspective.

About the Author

, Director, Global Customer Engineering, has worked in the information security industry for 20 years on tasks ranging from firewall administration to network security monitoring. His obsession with getting people access to answers led him to publish Practical Vulnerability Management with No Starch Press in 2020. He holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Clark University, an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Connecticut, and an M.S. in Information Management from the University of Washington. To contact Andy, visit him on LinkedIn.

logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that strongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

Alternatives to ManageEngine PAM360
Alternatives to ManageEngine PAM360
ManageEngine’s PAM360 gives system administrators a centralized way to manage and audit user and privileged accounts within network resources. However, teams that need to manage secure access to Kubernetes environments or enforce password policies within their privileged access management (PAM) system may want to consider other options. This blog post will cover ManageEngine PAM 360 and some solid alternatives, along with the pros and cons of each.
CyberArk vs. Thycotic (Delinea)
CyberArk vs. Thycotic (Delinea): Which Solution is Better?
In this article, we’ll compare two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions: CyberArk vs. Thycotic, with a closer look at what they are, how they work, and which will best fit your organization. We’ll explore product summaries, use cases, pros and cons, PAM features, and pricing to that by the end of this article, you’ll have a clearer understanding of how these PAM tools work and be able to choose the one that’s right for you.
Cloudflare Access alternative
Alternatives to Cloudflare Access
Cloudflare Access is a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) SaaS application that works with identity providers and endpoint protection platforms to enforce access policies for corporate applications, private IP spaces, and hostnames. It aims to prevent lateral movement and reduce VPN reliance. However, if you're looking to enable fast, secure access to your stack - with complete audit trails - Cloudflare Access might not be the best solution for your requirements.
Pomerium alternatives
Alternatives to Pomerium
Pomerium is an "identity-aware proxy" which aims to disrupt the VPN industry. Pomerium works on just about any device, providing remote access management solutions for individuals to enterprise level companies. Pomerium works as a SASE solution which allows users to manage authentication and authorization of any internal or third party application. Essentially, Pomerium adds SSO capabilities to just about any application. However, if you're looking for a more robust way to manage access to databases and Kubernetes clusters, Pomerium might not be the best solution for your needs. This blog post will take a look at a few alternatives and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each.
Perimeter 81 alternatives
Alternatives to Perimeter 81
Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) platform that provides centralized access to local networks, applications, and cloud resources. The company takes a security-first approach and aims to disrupt the VPN industry by offering a simple and scalable network access alternative for organizations of all sizes. However, if you're looking for a more reliable and enterprise-ready solution to manage access to infrastructure, Perimeter 81 might not be the best solution for your needs. This blog post will take a look at a few alternatives and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each.