<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">
Curious about how StrongDM works? 🤔 Learn more here!
Close icon
Search bar icon

StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison

StrongDM manages and audits access to infrastructure.
  • Role-based, attribute-based, & just-in-time access to infrastructure
  • Connect any person or service to any infrastructure, anywhere
  • Logging like you've never seen

CyberArk and StrongDM are two distinct privileged access management (PAM) solutions designed to provide secure access to critical infrastructure. While there are some similarities in functionality their approach to securing access is different.

What Is CyberArk?

CyberArk’s Privileged Access Manager is designed to secure, manage, and monitor privileged accounts within an organization. End users are typically comprised of a small subset of the engineering or IT team and tend to be systems administrators (sysadmins) or databases administrators (DBAs). The toolset is designed primarily for legacy server operating systems, like Windows, or older database management systems, such as Oracle, Sybase, or DB2. It was originally designed to run on Windows workstations and integrate with LDAP and Active Directory. Access is typically done through a web interface or locally installed utility. Components of the system include a password vault, central policy manager, and privileged session manager. In most cases, CyberArk is able to provide an audit trail of queries and session replays.

What Is StrongDM?

StrongDM is a proxy that combines authentication, authorization, networking, and observability into a single product. The product is designed to unify and simplify privileged access workflows by providing low-friction connectivity to every piece of infrastructure in your stack. 

  • DevOps: DevOps teams can provision and deprovision access to specific instances, servers, or databases, in a matter of clicks.
  • Security & Compliance: Security and compliance teams gain full visibility into “who did what when” on each system, including video playback of what individual users have executed on specific systems. For compliance, full records are kept of “who was in each system and what were they doing” at any given point in time.
  • Admins: Access to critical infrastructure can be granted and revoked quickly and easily, greatly simplifying user onboarding and offboarding, provisioning for third parties, and the ability to provide access for a specified period of time. Users, roles, and access are easily managed via an Admin UI (CLI available as well).

StrongDM vs. CyberArk: What’s the Difference?

There are several key capabilities that differentiate StrongDM from CyberArk as access management solutions.

1. Agentless Architecture

StrongDM does not require agents to be installed on end resources. This means fewer administrative headaches in managing the solution and faster time-to-value for the product. CyberArk’s architecture requires seven servers, plus the CyberArk vault, to implement. Each component needs to be working in order for PAM to be implemented. This agent-based design makes it difficult to manage and exposes it to several places for failure. The complexity of deployment also requires professional services.

💡Make it easy: Agentless architecture makes it easy to deploy, manage, and maintain StrongDM. Enforce just-in-time (JIT) security policies to cloud-native and hybrid infrastructures. Try it yourself.


2. Scalability

StrongDM leverages a true cloud-first approach, making it easier to scale in a single environment across multiple regions. This is particularly important for large enterprises. CyberArk’s approach requires the installation and management of self-hosted components, and endpoint agents that add to the complexity of managing the solution and decreasing flexibility.

3. Vault Agnostic

StrongDM has its own native vault and also integrates with multiple third-party vaults. Credentials are never exposed to end users, securely encrypted and not retrievable after setup. This allows vendors flexibility in their vault vendor and leverage existing security investments. CyberArk requires companies to manage access strictly with the CyberArk Vault.

4. Breadth of Support

StrongDM has native protocol support for infrastructure on-premises or in the cloud, including cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and any cloud databases. CyberArk’s core focus is on legacy on-premises systems, such as RDP, SSH, IBM 3720, MMSQL. This limitation lacks access control and visibility into all your resources. Support for modern cloud and databases often requires plugins and professional services.

5. Just-in-Time Access

StrongDM supports Just-in-Time access to databases, cloud, servers, and clusters through Access Workflows. CyberArk is only able to support Just-in-Time access to a portion of the stack and does not support cloud managed databases or PaaS.

6. Total Cost of Ownership

StrongDM offers simple per user pricing, starting at $70/license, including secure access to all resource types. Deployment requires no professional services, and the agentless architecture makes it easy to implement, manage, and maintain. CyberArk’s products are some of the most expensive on the market, with a high total cost of ownership. CyberArk requires additional hardware costs, has high licensing costs and you need to buy Professional Services for deployment and management. Operational costs are high with multiple systems and components to maintain.

StrongDM or CyberArk: Which One is Better for You?

  StrongDM CyberArk
Completeness of Offering
Supports 100+ protocols (both cloud-native & on-prem) including DBs, Amazon EC2, MongoDB, Redis, Kubernetes, Docker & more
Ease of Use
No install on servers
Multiple and concurrent vault support
Actionable Reporting (unused privileged access, sensitive resource access grants, and access review)
High Availability
Disaster Recovery
Cost/User includes all resource types


StrongDM is built for an organization's entire technical staff, not just developers. It’s easy to adopt by end users because it seamlessly integrates with existing tools and workflows including identity providers and vault solutions. StrongDM has superior reliability and a more cost effective pricing model. See StrongDM in action, book a demo.

About the Author

, Product Marketing Manager, an accomplished product marketing manager with over 5 years of experience in the technology industry. She is skilled at developing comprehensive product marketing plans that encompass messaging, positioning, and go-to-market strategies. Throughout her career, Fazila has worked with technology products including software applications and cloud-based solutions. She is constantly seeking to improve her skills and knowledge through ongoing training and professional development. She is a member of the Product Marketing Alliance and is an AWS Cloud Certified Practitioner. To contact Fazila, visit her on LinkedIn.

StrongDM logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

StrongDM vs. AWS SSM Session Manager: Side-by-Side Comparison
StrongDM vs. AWS SSM Session Manager: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both AWS Systems Manager (SSM) Session Manager and StrongDM are solutions for gaining remote access to critical infrastructure. Yet, while they share some of the same capabilities required of an enterprise access management platform, the execution and the ultimate goals they accomplish for security and compliance teams are very different.
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Which One Is Better
StrongDM vs. Teleport: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and Teleport are access control solutions designed to provide secure access to databases, servers, clusters, and web apps. While there are some similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
AWS Secrets Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to AWS Secrets Manager
AWS Secrets Manager is a popular and highly intuitive secrets management tool that lets organizations automate secrets rotation processes and securely store, manage, and audit IT credentials. However, certain AWS Secrets Manager alternatives are available if you are looking to avoid getting tied down exclusively to AWS products or prioritize efficient user onboarding. In this product comparison guide, we evaluate AWS Secrets Manager competitors that can fill in some of its product gaps.
Azure Key Vault Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Azure Key Vault
Microsoft Azure Key Vault is a cryptographic and secrets management solution for storing encryption keys, certificates, and passwords. While known for its interface simplicity and robust security, users should look to Azure Key Vault alternatives if they prioritize employee onboarding automation or need quick and easy implementation. This article evaluates Azure Key Vault competitors regarding security features, pricing, and usability to identify the best alternative options.
Google Cloud Secret Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Google Cloud Secret Manager
Google Cloud Secret Manager is an intuitive platform for managing API keys, user passwords, digital certificates, and other sensitive data and administering access control policies for business resources. While cost-friendly and reliable for securing Google Cloud applications, you should look to other Google Cloud Secret Manager competitors if you manage complex infrastructure and need multiple integrations.