<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/6169bf9791429100154fc0a2" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">
LAUNCH WEEK 🚀 Enable continuous, contextual + granular authorization. Learn more.

StrongDM vs. Teleport: Side-by-Side Comparison

StrongDM manages and audits access to infrastructure.
  • Role-based, attribute-based, & just-in-time access to infrastructure
  • Connect any person or service to any infrastructure, anywhere
  • Logging like you've never seen

Both StrongDM and Teleport are access control solutions designed to provide secure access to databases, servers, clusters, and web apps. While there are some similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences. 

What Is Teleport?

Teleport provides access management for cloud-native infrastructure. Teleport is an access and authentication proxy for SSH and Kubernetes API access. It's meant as a replacement for sshd and it works with existing OpenSSH clients and servers as-is. It allows administrators to set up access for users and groups to groups of servers, called clusters, and implements role-based access control (RBAC) to allow differing levels of access to different clusters. Individual server credentials are not available to users, reducing the administrative impact of rotating and removing credentials.

What Is StrongDM?

StrongDM is a proxy that combines authentication, authorization, networking, and observability into a single product. The product is designed to unify and simplify privileged access workflows by providing low-friction connectivity to virtually every piece of infrastructure in your stack.

  • DevOps: DevOps teams can provision and deprovision access to specific instances, servers, or databases, in a matter of clicks.
  • Security & Compliance: Security and compliance teams gain full visibility into “who did what when” on each system, including video playback of what individual users have executed on specific systems. For compliance, full records are kept of “who was in each system and what were they doing” at any given point in time.
  • Admins: Access to critical infrastructure can be granted and revoked quickly and easily, greatly simplifying user onboarding and offboarding, provisioning for third parties, and the ability to provide access for a specified period of time. Users, roles, and access are easily managed via an Admin UI (CLI available as well).

StrongDM vs. Teleport: What’s the Difference?

There are several key capabilities that differentiate StrongDM from Teleport as access management solutions.

1. Agentless Architecture

StrongDM does not require agents to be installed on end resources. This means fewer administrative headaches in managing the solution and faster time-to-value for the product. With Teleport, you need to deploy an agent on every target resource as well as two different Teleport services (proxy and authentication). The teleport agents run as root in every server you want to audit, creating a new attack vector and a new surface to protect. This also limits user access to critical infrastructure in the event that Teleport goes down. While Teleport does offer an agentless mode, it offers very limited features that do not include role-based access controls or granular auditing.

💡Make it easy: Agentless architecture makes it easy to deploy, manage, and maintain StrongDM. Enforce just-in-time (JIT) security policies to cloud-native and hybrid infrastructures. Agents cannot be deployed on cloud-managed databases limiting Teleport’s agent design to provide JIT to all resources. Try it yourself.


2. Identity Lifecycle Management

StrongDM integrates with identity providers to sync user and group provisioning, this automates joiner, mover, leaver workflows. Teleport simply integrates as an SSO provider.

3. Reliability

StrongDM updates daily without any downtime. Whereas, Teleport cloud is unreliable and availability numbers are inaccurate. When Teleport requires an update it results in downtime which means you can lose access to your critical systems for up to 6 hours. When there is a partial outage customers also lose all access to audit data putting compliance at risk.

4. Actionable Insights

StrongDM provides Advanced Insights to report on unused privileged access, sensitive access grants, and an overall access review. Teleport does not offer any insights into the implementation of access.

💡Make it easy: Out-of-the-box reports quantify your access permissions. Track metrics to enforce least privilege, prove security policies are enforced, answer access audit questions efficiently, and simplify incident investigations. Try it yourself.


5. Enhance Your Existing Security

StrongDM has its own native vault and also integrates with multiple third party vaults. Credentials are securely encrypted and not retrievable after setup, but they can be changed as needed with customers having full control. This allows secure access from anywhere while ensuring that your secrets never leave your control.

6. Breadth of Support

StrongDM supports all your infrastructure, not just the part of your infrastructure that can be configured to accept an x.509 certificate like with Teleport. This limitation increases your security risk and operational cost by forcing you to operate a certificate authority, or to trust theirs.

7. Pricing

StrongDM offers simple pricing, $70/license including to all resource types. Teleport offers licensing by user and by resource making costs add up quickly.

StrongDM or Teleport: Which One is Better for You?

  StrongDM Teleport
Completeness of Offering
Identity Lifecycle Management
Ease of Use
No install on servers
Multiple and concurrent vault support
High Availability
Disaster Recovery
Actionable Reporting (unused privileged access, sensitive resource access grants, and access review)
Cost/User includes all resource types


StrongDM is built for an organization's entire technical staff, not just developers. It’s easy to adopt by end users because it seamlessly integrates with existing tools and workflows including identity providers and vault solutions. StrongDM has superior reliability and a more cost effective pricing model. See StrongDM in action, book a demo.

About the Author

, Product Marketing Manager, an accomplished product marketing manager with over 5 years of experience in the technology industry. She is skilled at developing comprehensive product marketing plans that encompass messaging, positioning, and go-to-market strategies. Throughout her career, Fazila has worked with technology products including software applications and cloud-based solutions. She is constantly seeking to improve her skills and knowledge through ongoing training and professional development. She is a member of the Product Marketing Alliance and is an AWS Cloud Certified Practitioner. To contact Fazila, visit her on LinkedIn.

StrongDM logo
💙 this post?
Then get all that StrongDM goodness, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like

StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
StrongDM vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Comparison
Both StrongDM and CyberArk are privileged access management solutions to provide secure access to backend infrastructure. While there are many similarities between the two solutions, there are also some key differences.
AWS Secrets Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to AWS Secrets Manager
AWS Secrets Manager is a popular and highly intuitive secrets management tool that lets organizations automate secrets rotation processes and securely store, manage, and audit IT credentials. However, certain AWS Secrets Manager alternatives are available if you are looking to avoid getting tied down exclusively to AWS products or prioritize efficient user onboarding. In this product comparison guide, we evaluate AWS Secrets Manager competitors that can fill in some of its product gaps.
Azure Key Vault Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Azure Key Vault
Microsoft Azure Key Vault is a cryptographic and secrets management solution for storing encryption keys, certificates, and passwords. While known for its interface simplicity and robust security, users should look to Azure Key Vault alternatives if they prioritize employee onboarding automation or need quick and easy implementation. This article evaluates Azure Key Vault competitors regarding security features, pricing, and usability to identify the best alternative options.
Google Cloud Secret Manager Alternatives & Competitors
Alternatives to Google Cloud Secret Manager
Google Cloud Secret Manager is an intuitive platform for managing API keys, user passwords, digital certificates, and other sensitive data and administering access control policies for business resources. While cost-friendly and reliable for securing Google Cloud applications, you should look to other Google Cloud Secret Manager competitors if you manage complex infrastructure and need multiple integrations.
Competitors & Alternatives to Saviynt
Competitors & Alternatives to Saviynt
Saviynt is a popular identity and access management solution (IAM), but it may not be the best choice for every organization. In this article, we’ll explore powerful alternatives to Saviynt for companies with cloud-first IT infrastructure. By the end of this article, you’ll know whether Saviynt or one of these Saviynt competitors is the right fit for you.